Yes, "here, "here" was freely used, in my era, as an admonition to either 
desist from or alter your actions.

Jack


--- On Wed, 2/25/09, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: John Francis <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PDML Annual Arrives!
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 6:26 PM
> I think that's a different exclamation.
> It sounds a lot more like "Here!  Here!"
> (as in "Here! I say! What are you doing?),
> rather than an enthusuastic affirmation.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 07:56:08PM -0500, ann sanfedele
> wrote:
> > However....
> >
> > I think there is a reason we both spelled it
> "here, here" for a long  
> > time...
> >
> > back , back, back in the 50's  there was a silly
> litle high school joke  
> > going around where
> > some guy was groping a rather under-endowed woman -
> perhaps on their  
> > first date.. and the
> > woman , recoiling , said "hear , hear!"...
> the guy replied "where, where?"
> >
> > ann
> >
> > Jack Davis wrote:
> >
> >> Never mind, I just checked with
> "Ask.com" and Wikipedia indicates "hear,
> hear" is the correct spelling to indicate agreement.
> >> Now we can all go on with our lives.
> >>
> >> Jack
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Jack Davis
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >>> From: Jack Davis <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: PDML Annual Arrives!
> >>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> <[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 8:57 AM
> >>> Ken, I used this spelling of the term,
> "here,
> >>> here" sometime ago and was pummeled with
> spelling
> >>> correction clods. I've now seen it spelled
> this way a
> >>> couple times lately without noticeing (perhaps
> I just missed
> >>> them) any such reaction. Wonder which it
> should be?
> >>>
> >>> Jack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Ken Waller
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> From: Ken Waller
> <[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: Re: PDML Annual Arrives!
> >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>> <[email protected]>
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 8:20 AM
> >>>> Here, Here !
> >>>>
> >>>> Kenneth Waller
> >>>> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From:
> "Paul
> >>>> Stenquist"
> <[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: Re: PDML Annual Arrives!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>>> By any name, Doug's words are
> eloquent and
> >>>>>        
> >>>>>
> >>> enrich
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> the book greatly.
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>> On Feb 24, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Mark
> Roberts wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>        
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Doug Brewer wrote:
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Christine Aguila wrote:
> >>>>>>>            
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My hardback w/dust jacket
> arrived
> >>>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> earlier
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> this evening. Everything  about it is
> OUTSTANDING!!!!      
> >>>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> & crew did a superb job with  picture
> prep and
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>> layout
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> etc.  All the photographs are just 
> TERRIFIC!!!!
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> I would, however,  like to
> make
> >>>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>>
> >>> special
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> mention about Doug's  Forward, which I
> thought
> >>>> delightful-- a vivid word picture which 
> accurately
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>> renders
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> the spirit of PDML.  Wonderfully done,
> Doug.   Big
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> Christine
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> thank you, C. It was fun to
> write.
> >>>>>>>            
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> When I asked Doug to write a few
> paragraphs
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>
> >>> for
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> the book, his  response was "Normal
> paragraphs or
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>> my
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>>> paragraphs?"
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I think the result was
> "Brewer
> >>>>>>          
> >>>>>>
> >>>> paragraphs" but I'm not sure.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>>
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
> the link
> >>>> directly above and follow the directions.
> >>>>      
> >>>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link
> >>> directly above and follow the directions.
> >>>    
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>      
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link directly above and follow the directions.
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to