On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0900, David Savage scripsit: > 2009/2/28 Graydon <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:21:02PM +0900, David Savage scripsit: > >> That's the process Paul. The more accurate comparison would be: > >> viewing photos on screen (monitor or digital picture frame) or in > >> print. > >> > >> Which do you prefer? > > > > For what purpose? > > It's not a trick question. When viewing photographs do you prefer to > look at pictures on a monitor or in print?
Don't think I care in the general case. Subject matters; Ansel Adams' work looks better in big prints. LOLcats look as good as they're going to on the monitor, but that is not a worthless amount. > Every time I pick up a print that I've just made, and the recent PDML > annual, reinforce my preferred choice of image display media. But that's your preferred choice; personal aesthetic decision. Those are absolutely required and they don't generalize well if at all. [snip] > > But you're old. > > Yes, I'm an old 31. Functionally, yeah, sounds like. What about the future will be better, from the point of view of your photography? -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
