G'day Nick

Back in August last year I asked a simple question "When is a little
Photoshoppery too much Photoshoppery?".  This produced a flood of
responses which pretty much covered the whole gamut of opinions on the
'honesty/dishonesty' question.

You might find it interesting to  read through that thread in the
archives.

http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2008-August/thread.html



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/


On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:51 -0500, "Nick Wright"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it is. But somewhere along the line I came to view one as
> "honest" and the other as "dishonest."
> 
> Not that it's that simple though. Because I think that a "straight"
> photo can be dishonest as well.
> 
> Which is something that I've also been thinking about in regards to my
> original photo. I like my shot quite a bit, but I cycled past that
> church again the other day and I realized that it is not an honest
> photo.
> 
> The reason I believe that is because in the photo the tower appears to
> be much taller than the rest of the building, when in reality the roof
> line to the right of the tower in the photo is higher.
> 
> I didn't think about it when I shot it, and then I didn't think about
> it when I got the negs back.
> 
> So what do you all think about that?
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Bruce Dayton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Isn't just changing the lens or the angle that you take the shot,
> > changing the perspective?  It would seem that if altering the photo
> > after the shot bothers you, then altering the photo before the shot
> > should to.  Just different methods of accomplishing the same basic
> > thing.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 5:06:20 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > NW> Thanks to all the folks who took time to comment on this last PESO of
> > NW> mine. I do appreciate the critiques.
> >
> > NW> One item I'd like to touch on is the concept of software perspective
> > NW> control. I'd been thinking about this recently before I'd posted my
> > NW> PESO and then Brian brought it up in his critique of my image.
> >
> > NW> I'm just amazed at how fast technology changes. The last time I was an
> > NW> active member of this list (granted that was 8 years ago) the only way
> > NW> to achieve perspective control was with a view camera or shift lens.
> > NW> Now you can get something of the same effect using photoshop.
> >
> > NW> I don't currently have any software with the ability to "correct"
> > NW> perspective, but an older laptop of mine had Elements 2 which did. I
> > NW> played around with it a bit but never could really get my heart into
> > NW> it.
> >
> > NW> I think it mainly has to do with all those years at the newspaper. Any
> > NW> alteration of a photograph like that just makes me cringe.
> >
> > NW> I'm curious to hear more of you all's opinions on the process?
> >
> > NW> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >>> Nice composition but the tower gets a  bit lost in the background sky.
> >>>
> >>> Also, I'd try a bit of perspective correction to make the verticals
> >>> vertical and the horizontals, er...horizontal.  It may not be an
> >>> improvement but worth investigating.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Brian
> >>>
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> Brian Walters
> >>> Western Sydney Australia
> >>> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:52 -0500, "Nick Wright"
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Here's another PESO:
> >>>> http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/church-tower-2/
> >>>>
> >>>> Comment welcome and appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ~Nick David Wright
> >>>> http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> >>> follow the directions.
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Nick David Wright
> http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to