On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50 files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to CA when used in digital applications. However, I have to admit that I haven't studied FA 35/2 results at a pixel level.
Here's my 16-50 from (a couple repairs ago, so maybe I have to try it again now that it's been worked on a few times) from last summer at 100% crop of the upper-right-hand corner.
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2008/imgp2034_crop.jpg Yeah, there's a little bit of CA there! Here's the full shot http://charles.robinsontwins.org/twinsdays/2008/content/IMGP2034_large.html -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [email protected] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
