Proof positive that you were the proud owner of a broken lens.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to CA when used
in digital applications. However, I have to admit that I haven't
studied FA 35/2 results at a pixel level.
Here's my 16-50 from (a couple repairs ago, so maybe I have to try
it again now that it's been worked on a few times) from last summer
at 100% crop of the upper-right-hand corner.
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2008/imgp2034_crop.jpg
Yeah, there's a little bit of CA there!
Here's the full shot
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/twinsdays/2008/content/IMGP2034_large.html
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
