i know who magritte is. and that is beside the point. the image was sent here as a tribute to rodchenko. and it's why it was made (i was looking at his work today). of course, you can view any photo beside the author's point of view, but disregarding how the author caps it, because of not knowing what does the cap mean (although it is quite easy - 2 google clicks) is what i don't really understand.
and by all means - you are free to think it is bad, or just plain don't like it - and say whatever you want. of course, i am too. On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:34 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:30:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > well, it's kind of pointless giving a comment on a tribute, suggesting > a crucial change to the image, without even checking-out who is the > tribute to. > and rodchenko is a very important photographer, btw, not some half-known > guy. > > =========== > Magritte's an important painter. Okay, I don't like it, sorry. > > http://www.eyeconart.net/history/surrealism.htm > > Marnie :-) > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make meals for Under > $10. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000002) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
