In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:47:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: i was actuall hoping that someone would be provoked to find out who the guy is by going to google image search and typing rodchenko. of course, you don't like this, so you can be not-interested in whatever inspired it.
but giving opinions about a 'tribute to x' without any concern about x is pointless to me. that's what i've been trying to say. i don't see a reason for you to constantly change thesis in this conversation. it's beginning to annoy me. ============ I have no wish to have an argument. You seem to want to argue about it. Ergo, I said I don't like it to cut it short. Also, I only have so much time to spend looking at each pic, too. I have already reached my quota for PDML arguments for this year (books vs electrical readers). Or at least I have reached my quota for the first six months of the year. I think it isn't that good a photoshop job, frankly. The idea may be good, I can't tell. A darker picture, not so bright, might work better. IMHO, a picture should stand on its own, without a title even. That's not always the way it works on this list, many geso pictures can't stand alone, and sometimes the title really determines who likes a particular picture on this list. But it's what I believe. Also my standards for art are higher than those for photographs. HTH, Take Care, Later, Marnie :-) --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make meals for Under $10. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000002) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
