In a message dated 12/26/2001 11:05:15 PM US Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/26/2001 6:06:42 PM US Eastern Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >>And part because it looks like an ungainly brick. > > > > Have you taken the trouble to look closely at the competition? > > This silly question, which I take as an intended cute insult, is the > equivalent of telling me I should not judge one dog ugly until I go and > look at the other ugly, possibly uglier, dogs on the next block. So > what. That is not at all relevant to my observations. > > Bob > With no intent to be insulting and no intent to defend the PZ1/PZ1p's beauty or lack thereof - My PZ1p's accomplish what I want within my own ability to create images. This would seem to be the only relevant factor. Granted, I "like" the appearance of my old K2's and the earlier Spotmatics more. In any case, both your judgements and mine are subjective. My point was simply that few, if any, of the modern plastic wonders are things of beauty. Regards, Ed M. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
