Well let's face it folks, what a camera looks like only determines... what it looks like. It's how it functions in the field that is really important.
I'm sure as Bruce said, they're both capable cameras. If you ask me, even pretty dogs are ugly. Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:04 PM Subject: Re: PZ-1p review > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/26/2001 6:06:42 PM US Eastern Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >>And part because it looks like an ungainly brick. > > > > Have you taken the trouble to look closely at the competition? > > This silly question, which I take as an intended cute insult, is the > equivalent of telling me I should not judge one dog ugly until I go and > look at the other ugly, possibly uglier, dogs on the next block. So > what. That is not at all relevant to my observations. > > Bob > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
