I'll have to see. I did shoot some without the converter.
I was out there for 5 hours and took 560 frames. During my first cull,
that was the one I thought I could get the best quick down & dirty image
with the least amount of work in PhotoShop & I wanted to get it up for
the PESO so I could go to bed.
I've still got to go through the whole batch a lot more thoroughly. I
know I got some of the mother feeding the chick, and I'll want to see if
one of them will make a better image.
From: Luiz Felipe
Well, I like it, and don't mind said softness. Just as minor question,
since you happened to downsize it anyway, what's the difference between
some shot with the 1.4 and another without the 1.4 but cropped to the
same image? Did that often in the film age, when I realized my vivitar
2x was just not good enough... and Ektar 25 was available.
LF
John Sessoms escreveu:
> I've been looking for the owl I heard earlier this month, trying to get
> some idea of its habits. Yesterday, I spotted it on the nest I thought
> it might use, and came back today with my camera:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/3396685627/
>
> K10D, Sigma 300 2.8 + Sigma APO 1.4x tele-converter, on a tripod ...
> ISO 400 (I think)
>
> The image is a bit soft. I've noticed that whenever I use the 1.4x
> converter, even though it's supposed to be matched to the lens.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
