---- Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christian" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: PESO: Kinfisher Redux > > > > John Whittingham wrote: > >> I'd love a 600/4 or 600'5.6, I can't justify spending that much on my > >> hobby, I'm nuts too, I must be! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > > > > I'm nuts to have done just that... I could have bought a new small car > > for what I paid for one lens... The lens gives me more pleasure than a > > car like that ever could :-) > > I bit the bullet years ago with the 600 FA (at the urging of my wife!) I now > have no excuses for my wildlife images. I had tried to make do with the 300 > f4.5 FA but it just wasn't enough for the images I was trying to capture. > > My last trip to Denali was basically unforgettable due to the 600 - had all > the lens (with a 1.4 XL convertor) that I could use. > > Never regretted it.
I don't think regretting it would be a problem for any of us. Managing it would be. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
