----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Sullivan" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Kinfisher Redux
It sucks to know people like you Ken! :-) Bob S.
Just trying to aid some people in their lens addiction. ;+]
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Kinfisher Redux
John Whittingham wrote:
I'd love a 600/4 or 600'5.6, I can't justify spending that much on my
hobby, I'm nuts too, I must be!
Regards,
I'm nuts to have done just that... I could have bought a new small car
for what I paid for one lens... The lens gives me more pleasure than a
car
like that ever could :-)
I bit the bullet years ago with the 600 FA (at the urging of my wife!) I
now
have no excuses for my wildlife images. I had tried to make do with the
300
f4.5 FA but it just wasn't enough for the images I was trying to capture.
My last trip to Denali was basically unforgettable due to the 600 - had
all
the lens (with a 1.4 XL convertor) that I could use.
Never regretted it.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
