Im not pretending they are the exact same thing, its just the added features of the 60-250 simply dont even come close to adding up to $1200 added value over $139 70-210/4/A lens price to ME. Thats the math I did.
JC O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 8:08 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: DA* 60-250 at B&H On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:56 AM, JC OConnell <[email protected]> wrote: > $1300+ is not that terrible much? Wouldnt you rather see a test > comparison to the $139 typical smc-A/70-210/F4 before judging that > $1300+ price? > > JC O'Connell (mailto:[email protected]) > "Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas > Jefferson When the A70-210 AF's in a downpour, I'll consider it a valid comparison. I like the A70-210, but it's only very generally comparable to the DA*60-250. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
