John Francis wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:25:30PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
Pragmatically, if that thing on top of the K-7 is an EVF, you're likely
right. If it's a full-view, full magnification pentaprism, I'm going to
suggest that it means I'm right, at least as far as "optical viewfinder"
being included in the intended market differentiation strategy goes.
Basing predictions for Pentax bodies on features showing up in past bodies
has not, historically, been a sure-fire strategy. A few examples:
o Pentax put a 1/8000 shutter speed and 1/250 flash sync in the PZ-1p;
features that never showed up again in any future Pentax bodies (so
far; we'll see whether this remains true later this month).
Well, we have now a high speed sync, up to of 1/6000 isn't it? The 1/180
is only needed for older flashes.
o They went back to requiring lenses with aperture rings for the MZ/ZX
(after having introduced the two-thumbwheel control model on the PZ-
series bodies). But, as the DA lenses have shown, that didn't last.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
