John,
I've come to really like the A300/4 on the AF1.7X.
It stays sharp and gains some autofocus.
But remembering to input 500mm and changing ISO can be a challenge.
I have some really unsharp shots with the combo and shake reduction at 20mm.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:18 AM, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Bob.
>
> It was close to a comedy routine getting this shot, though.
> Larry, Angel and I were taking it easy after a few hours in
> the sun, and almost ready to pack up and go home.  Then this
> fellow starts calling.  Of course I don't have the 300mm with
> me at the table, so I go back to the car to get it, along
> with the monopod and the 1.7xAF adapter.  (The car is only 20
> or 30 feet away, so fetching the gear doesn't take too long).
> I've just got everything put together, and am setting up to
> grab a shot, when the bird flies away.
> We decide to sit around and wait for a while to see if he will
> come back.  Eventually, though (probably after 20-30 minutes)
> it's getting time for Angel to head back to his hotel (and for
> me to get home to take my wife out to the Star Trek movie), so
> we decide to give up for the day.  I've just got everything
> broken down, and the lens back in it's carry case, when our
> friend decides to show up again.  So I hastly put everything
> back together.  I did remember to set the SR focal length to
> 500mm, but neglected to change the ISO back to 640 from 100
> (and forgot that I've now set ISO up on the second dial in Av
> mode, so I left the camera in my usual hyper program mode).
> I grabbed a quick couple of shots hand-held before trying to
> get the camera on the monopod - one came out quite well,
> even though that was 1/50 of a second with a 500mm lens,
> but the pose and lighting aren't as good as the shot that
> I posted.  Then the bird flew off again, but fortunately
> this time he stopped again just a few feet further away.
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:08:08AM -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>> John,
>> That's a hansom bird.  Nice photo.
>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 AM, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:22:15PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sunday, John took Angel and I to a rose garden in San Jose, I
>> >> finally had a chance to do a quick sort and process on my
>> >> photos. Despite the wind, I got a few decent ones:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157618121808920/
>> >>
>> >> I'm still going through the 2700 or so shots I took the previous
>> >> weekend in Chicago, so I'm wimping out and just doing the gallery
>> >> thing. Yes, I know, flickr sucks.
>> >>
>> >> John, what's the name of the park we were shooting quail in?
>> >
>> > It was the Bernal-Gulnac-Joice ranch in Santa Terasa County Park.
>> >
>> > I foolishly left the ISO set to 100, so I wasn't really using a
>> > fast enough shutter speed (and had the lens wide open, which isn't
>> > really what you want to do when using the AF adapter). ?But I did
>> > get one shot of that elusive quail that's not too bad:
>> >
>> > ? ?http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0921
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> > follow the directions.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to