All good stuff, Mark. Beautifully exposed! I gave a positive review of what was either 3309 or 10 when posted earlier. I did, however, feel the slightest twinge of guilt for not grading it down a nit notch for the OOF foreground leaves. Silly I suppose, but that piece of log debris in the cascade shots bothers me. Clone tool(?)
Jack --- On Wed, 6/3/09, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: Pentax 67 - More waterfall shots > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 7:46 AM > Just got a roll of slide film scanned > in. Here are a few 67 shots of > the same waterfall you've probably seen before: > > http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/ > > No cropping or exposure compensation (not even Levels or > Curves > adjustments yet). These are just what you'd see if you put > thePrintFile page on a light table. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
