Oh, I see. Hadn't considered the breeze to have been the problem. Their proximity to the camera and the fact that I don't see it in any other area, lead me to that conclusion. WRT the log, guess I just bother more easily. ;-)
Jack --- On Wed, 6/3/09, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Pentax 67 - More waterfall shots > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 9:17 AM > Jack Davis wrote: > > > > >All good stuff, Mark. Beautifully exposed! I gave a > positive review of what was either 3309 or 10 when posted > earlier. I did, however, feel the slightest twinge of guilt > for not grading it down a nit notch for the OOF foreground > leaves. > >Silly I suppose, but that piece of log debris in the > cascade shots bothers me. Clone tool(?) > > Thanks for the comments! The earlier post was actually a > different > shot, taken with the K20D during the same session. > (Technical nit: The > foreground leaves aren't out of focus, they're moving > around during > the 30-second exposure.) And the log debris doesn't bother > me at all > so I'll have to pass on the clone tool. :) > > > >> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/waterfall/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
