On 18/6/09, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:

>Call me a Luddite or curmudgeon or jack-ass or whatever, but it sure
>would be nice if the folks who made our cameras would make a model or
>two that didn't include a bunch of fluff, like facial recognition (I'm
>pretty good with that myself) and video.  Instead, this is
>revolutionary, they could put some functional _parts_ in the camera,
>like a real viewfinder that doesn't resemble a mile-long tunnel of
>distortion.

I would possibly jump at the Digital Pen with viewfinder and 17mm as a
pocket camera - especially as I've photographed my R-D1 and lenses ready
for eBay. But it's still not quite right for me. The R-D1 was close,
very close. The M8 is too big and expensive. Something Leica CL size,
screw the zooms (not literally) and I'll just have a couple of primes.

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to