I for one am not surprised, everything is made of plastic now.

Miserere wrote:
I was quite happy with the Pen E-P1 and counting the years until I
could afford one...but then I saw these photos:

http://photorumors.com/2009/06/17/the-guts-of-the-m43-olympus-e-p1/
http://photorumors.com/2009/06/17/is-the-olympus-zuiko-17mm-f28-pancake-lens-all-plastic/

I am not against plastic per se, but *this much*? And I have to wonder
exactly how much firmware is loaded into that lens. Are the circuit
boards solely for focusing, or are they responsible for
distortion/CA/PF/crapshoot correction too?

I have the benefit of being able to sit back and watch. And that's
just what I'm going to do.


 --M.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.EnticingTheLight.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



2009/6/19 Cotty <[email protected]>:
On 18/6/09, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:

Call me a Luddite or curmudgeon or jack-ass or whatever, but it sure
would be nice if the folks who made our cameras would make a model or
two that didn't include a bunch of fluff, like facial recognition (I'm
pretty good with that myself) and video.  Instead, this is
revolutionary, they could put some functional _parts_ in the camera,
like a real viewfinder that doesn't resemble a mile-long tunnel of
distortion.
I would possibly jump at the Digital Pen with viewfinder and 17mm as a
pocket camera - especially as I've photographed my R-D1 and lenses ready
for eBay. But it's still not quite right for me. The R-D1 was close,
very close. The M8 is too big and expensive. Something Leica CL size,
screw the zooms (not literally) and I'll just have a couple of primes.

--


Cheers,
 Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or 
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn 
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a 
free man any more than a dog.

        --G. K. Chesterton


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to