I met a film director in LA who was also a skilled and widely
published still photographer. Unfortunately, I've forgotten his name.
But he specialized in pictures of lions, tigers and other similar
creatures, all taken with a Pentax 6x7 and 45 mm lens. Some were full
frame.
Paul
On Jun 19, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:35:53AM -0400, Graydon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:31:26AM -0400, Doug Franklin scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Though I think there is a subtle set of cues that let people know
if the
image was taken with a short lens or a long lens; I'm certainly much
more impressed by short-lens bear pictures, for example. (For some
value of impressed that involves questioning sanity...)
This reminds me of one of my favorite photos which is a photo of a
baby scrub jay with my bigma.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/2490121960/sizes/l/in/set-72157605158235702/
--
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the wrong answer.
Larry Colen [email protected] http://www.red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
