To me, it looks correct as presented. The rust spots are in line, and
are obviously the result of trickle down moisture. The horizontal
lines are secondary to the vertical.
I like it.
Paul
On Jun 27, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:24 -0700, "Joseph McAllister" <[email protected]
>
wrote:
I think part of the visual confusion is that the left edge should be
at the top, to make the streaks of rust run down the plate, rather
than across it. Unless the wind is very strong and constant in situ.
I think it's a shot with great potential. If it looked good on your
screen, as if you'd made a large print of it, it will probably look
great once enlarged and printed.
Joe
Thanks Joe. Yes maybe it would look 'right' rotated 90 degrees but,
of
course, that wasn't the way it was.
:-)>
Here's a larger version (1.3 MB)
http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1370864/decay.jpg
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
G'day all
Not sure about this one. I think it would fit well as part of a
gallery
on the decaying machinery at the old Cockatoo Island shipyards in
Sydney
Harbour. I like the colours and patterns, but is the photo strong
enough to stand alone?
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/145702/Decay.html
--
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
