On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:53:10 +0200 AlunFoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subash, > > If it was me I'd be thinking like this: > I wouldn't dare to leave the tripod at home. The 50mm focal length is > duplicated by the long zoom, so the 50mm would be off my packing list. > The 35mm is conveniently between the two zooms, and will also serve > well in low-light. With particularly spectacular landscapes, it will > also be a good choice for making mosaics (or panos, if you like) to up > the resolution. > > Whether by leaving other stuff at home or by carrying the extra > weight, I think suffering for the art is worthwhile within your > limits. > thanks Jostein, for thinking this through in detail. appreciate it. i am actually coming around to the conclusion that i can suffer a little more for art's sake and carry the fa35/2 as well. :) after all it's just an additional 200 gms more. i'll have to cut corners elsewhere... > For positive thinking, be glad you don't own a 600mm... :-) :-) otoh, if that's weighing too much on your mind, i am sure there are people here only too eager to relieve you of your worries. :) regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
