Bob W wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:13:54AM +0100, Bob W scripsit:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 06:27:13PM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit:
2009/7/9 Graydon <[email protected]>:
My take on this is that the 50-135 is the people range and the
60-250 is the zoo range. (Actual wildlife would be
the 200-500
Pentax has inexplicably failed to announce. :)
So a man photographing chimps in a zoo would need 60-250, while
the zoo-resident chimp photographing people would need
the 50-135.
Only if the chimp got to wander freely with the people.
[...]
Get yourself to Chester!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/8135603.stm
That could have been very bad; glad they got distracted by
the bananas.
I was surprised they could tell which were the chimps and which were the
Lancashire people.
Bob
Well, obviously the chimp's had better table manners...
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
