Here in .au, where I suspect the light is very similar, I constantly had to dial in + exposure compensation with the K20D.
When I got the D700 I had to break that habit. DS > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Boris Liberman > Sent: Wednesday, 15 July 2009 12:09 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K20D heresy > > Doug, I think it has to do with the specifics of your light. Here, > where sun is strong and most of the day very high up, I tend to go > -1/3 or even -2/3 EV on my K10D. Since I got the rather bright Katz > Eye screen for the camera, it is affecting the metering and so I don't > have to dial in my negative compensation. > > I should be interested to compare how new metering system of K-7 fares > under the promised sun of the promised land ;-). > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Doug Franklin<[email protected]> > wrote: > > I normally shoot PEF+JPG, and I've found that the JPGs come out better if I > > set +0.5 to +1 exposure compensation, regardless of the lens I'm using, with > > both the *ist D and the K10D. I haven't tried the K20D or the K7. The RAWs > > aren't any better but they seem to take less "conversion machinations", too. > > It seems like the converters I've used start with the camera settings as > > their baseline, or something. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
