That would be "very nice." I'm also very pleased with the 500 some
frames I shot on my gig in western Illinois Tuesday. Pleasing in a
number of ways.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2009, at 8:02 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I haven't put the K7 to that severe a test, but I noticed when
shooting Grace's t-ball game that I could keep focus on a runner for
a series of shots. Very nide.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:44 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
On paper the K20D will do about 2.5 frames per second.
On paper the K-7 is about twice as fast.
Today I played around with both cameras in a park, tracking hooded
gulls as they flew past, and snapping away with the DA*300/4 mounted.
IOW, BiF. :-)
I was stunned by the difference. The K-7 locked focus on the gull and
kept it there for whole series at a time, while the K20D struggled to
reestablish focus between every shot. As a result, about one in four
was in focus with the K20D. With the K-7, the ratio was 17 out of 20.
And needless to say, the practical difference in actual FPS is far
more than the nominal doubling. My gut feeling says today's
performance was about 3x faster for the K-7.
Can't wait to repeat the test with the FA*600/4.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
