Hi Tim

I'ne only tried it to see what it's like, unfortunately,  because pressure of 
work has prevented me doing any bird photography lately. I was suitably 
impressed with it though, the longest lens I have is the DA* 300/4 fitted with 
1.4, 1.5 or 1.7x TC. I'm hoping the 393 will help me with sharper images when 
SR is not so effective due to using one of the TC's. Initial tests proved it to 
be quite effective even when used with 300mm + 1.7 TC down to 1/125 sec. I'm 
hopimg to return to Mere Sands Wood (Kingfisher territory) and try it someday 
soon.

Are you still using yours? How do you find it?

Regards,

John
________________________________________
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Øsleby 
[maritim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 July 2009 10:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Minor enablement

I'm wading back in old mails here.
The 393 isn't a minor enablement. It opened up a new world for me.
What lenses are you using, and how do you like it?


--
MaritimTim


2009/6/18 John Whittingham <jo...@carmel.ac.uk>:
> Got myself a  Manfrotto 393 head (Bogen 3421),  haven't tried it but looks 
> really well made and functional, just had to tell someone.
>
> Regards.
>

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to