I don't know about others, but I think Super A/Program and ME Super are some of the most reliable Pentax bodies. LX certainly is not on the list.
regards, Alan Chan > so it seems there are mostly happy users with few who were unlucky > and had to spend fortune on repairs. So there is some risk I think. > > Well, I still don't know... I wanted the LX because I need a good > main camera instead of my SFXn, keeping the K2DMD as a great backup > or second body for colour/B&W choices. I wanted a body that would > be easy to use (I never got truly used to SFXn, I kept forgeting to > set the iso or exposure compensation back to zero,... - not that > it's a bad body, it's one of the last AF bodies with completely metal > guts, quite rugged and with a better viewfinder than any later AF > body with exception of MZ-S and maybe Z1p, but its not my style > - I want knobs and dials: a Luddite camera <b>). A body which can > operate even without batteries. That won't fail on me during > shooting. But it seems even the LX isn't without quirks, and with > my (bad) luck in camera purchases... I simply don't know. > > BTW, that's another question - any members had their LX fail them > in any way during shooting? E.g. in India, or even plain studio at > home :) ? _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
