Specs can be deceiving.  You got to try it.  I brought an LX
to the store and tried FM3A along side with it.  FM3A feels
like crap (excuse me for the expression.)

I see these deficiencies:

        1. No interchangeable finders
        2. No OTF meetering
        3. Only 3 focusing screens (none of which I like)
        4. Feels flimsy and cheap (knock it on the table it might break)
        5. Can't buy 2nd hand, therefore price is too high

But two things it does have over the LX:

        1. Flash sync at 250.
        2. Quieter shutter.
        3. Feels lighter in weight (plastic inside?)

The LX is clearly more fun.

Regards,
___________________________________________________________________
Tonghang Zhou ("Zhou" is pronounced like Joe)

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mike Johnston wrote:

> Bob Walkden wrote:
> > From the spec you've given you might prefer to buy a new
> > Nikon FM3A, which has many of the great LX features (surpasses it in
> > some ways), but then you'd have to get a whole bunch of their lenses
> > too.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to