That aint the only thing from Nikon that could make one consider converting. However, I am still happy with my Pentax Glass and my MZ-S's. If I do any converting it will probably be to a 67II. All this talk is really making me want to take a stab at it.
Bruce Dayton Thursday, January 10, 2002, 2:27:57 PM, you wrote: JCOC> tHE SPECS AND PRICE OF THE NIKON FM3A ARE ENUFF JCOC> TO MAKE ONE CONVERT TO NIKON! JCOC> TOO BAD PENTAX DOESNT MAKE AN EQUIV. MANUAL JCOC> FOCUS KMOUNT BODY. JCOC> JCO >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:01 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: FM3A dilemma >> >> >> Bob Walkden wrote: >> > From the spec you've given you might prefer to buy a new >> > Nikon FM3A, which has many of the great LX features (surpasses it in >> > some ways), but then you'd have to get a whole bunch of their lenses >> > too. >> >> >> >> Augh! My current dilemma. >> >> --Mike J. >> >> >> "The 37th Frame," an independent newsletter for photographers >> www.37thframe.com >> - >> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . JCOC> - JCOC> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, JCOC> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to JCOC> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
