AlunFoto wrote: >When the K20D I was a bit surprised by how all the forums blabbed >about it being a "minor upgrade" from K10D, despite the facts. They >are two very, very different beasts. The K10D was probably as good as >any APS-C CCD sensor could get, and Pentax used a 22 bit A/D converter >to make sure they got the best signal achievable out of it. From there >to K20D's CMOS is nothing short of a new paradigma. The K-7 also >introduce a new tech platform since they've changed the operating >voltage, but the technological difference between K20D and K-7 is much >less of a revolution than the previous leap. Yet it receives so much >more attention. :-)
I agree completely. I still have and use my K10D but the step up to the K20D was very big indeed. I haven't bought a K7 yet. I may skip it and wait for the next camera in a year or so. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
