Dario Bonazza wrote: >Mark Roberts wrote: > >> AlunFoto wrote: >> >>>When the K20D I was a bit surprised by how all the forums blabbed >>>about it being a "minor upgrade" from K10D, despite the facts. They >>>are two very, very different beasts. The K10D was probably as good as >>>any APS-C CCD sensor could get, and Pentax used a 22 bit A/D converter >>>to make sure they got the best signal achievable out of it. From there >>>to K20D's CMOS is nothing short of a new paradigma. The K-7 also >>>introduce a new tech platform since they've changed the operating >>>voltage, but the technological difference between K20D and K-7 is much >>>less of a revolution than the previous leap. Yet it receives so much >>>more attention. :-) >> >> I agree completely. I still have and use my K10D but the step up to >> the K20D was very big indeed. I haven't bought a K7 yet. I may skip it >> and wait for the next camera in a year or so. > >Same here, except I no longer use my K10D since the K20D entered home.
I use the K10D whenever I'm carrying two cameras, when I need to be using 2 lenses in situations in which it's impractical to switch lenses on a single body. I did this last weekend when shooting the bicycle races - http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery16/. (And most of the keepers seemed to come from the K10D, although I expect that's mostly coincidental.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
