William, Between you, Aaron and Paul, I may get into this yet. Deep down I have wanted a 67 for several years, but have never quite taken the plunge. Obviously not enough enabling has happened. But with your encouragement, I will seriously take a look at it.
I would assume to start with body, metering prism (probably the new AEII), hand grip and maybe that 75 2.8 that Aaron got. Is that about the same as a 35 in 35mm? Shortly followed by a portrait focal length. Bruce Dayton Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:07:27 PM, you wrote: WR> ----- Original Message ----- WR> From: "Paul Stenquist" WR> Subject: Re: call for enablers! BRUCE DAYTON NEEDS A 67II! >> I felt a little bit guilty when I spent still more money on WR> cameras and >> bought my 6x7. But I don't regret it one bit now. It's WR> fantastic. Shot two >> rolls of tri-x today. Gonna go down and develop them now. Buy WR> it, Bruce. >> Buy it. Buy it. Buy it. You'll be glad you did. >> Paul WR> I live by the motto: "No guilt, no guilt". This allows me to WR> purchase what I feel I need to move my photographic endeavours WR> forward. WR> I think if other photographic artists lived by the same motto, WR> they too would have more equipment than they know what to do WR> with. WR> Without question, the Pentax 6x7 series of cameras are fine WR> photographic tools. WR> I had a look through the past galleries at the PUG, and counted WR> 29 images that Bruce has submitted that would have been improved WR> by the judicious application of a Pentax 6x7 format camera. WR> Bruce, you are a good photographer. Your pictures, and your WR> vision deserve a 67II. WR> William Robb WR> - WR> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, WR> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to WR> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
