On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I keep finding myself "needing" a lens that is wide, fast and
> preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
> my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
> from selling my racecar to buying glass.
>
> I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
> I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.
>
> Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options.
>
> Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
> A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
> A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
> SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
> Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370
>
> How do folks feel about these various lenses?
>

Here's a strong recommendation for teh Sigma 17-70. I had it for a
while when I had my K10D. You give up QSF, but get a lens which is as
fast or faster throughout its range than the DA 16-45 and is better
built, is a very good performer optically, offers 1:2.3 magnification
and has a zoom lock which locks it at 17mm


I generally used it as a 17mm prime with reach when I needed it,
mostly left it locked at 17mm. And I wish I still had it, it would
have been nice on my DS.

-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to