He restates and I paraphrase that the planet would be 32 degrees, (I
assume C), colder without the greenhouse effect. I didn't see any
particular proof that did more than restate an assumption.
On 1/17/2010 8:20 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/1/18 P. J. Alling<[email protected]>:
That's not a refutation. It's a bald statement of fact. Not even a link to
the paper refuting the work. Nor it such a work in his list of
publications. Now when he publishes we have an argument.
please look again, there are several chapter/paragraph references
would be nicer if it had been published as well for sure but that
doesnt make the formulae and conclusions presented any less worthy of
consideration
cheers
ecke
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
