Which is why I put it that way :) That said, speaking resolution, the K-7 has the obvious advantage when noise doesn't hammer it. Each individual will have to decide what she/he wants.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/02/2010, Thibouille <[email protected]> wrote: >> Some guys said the Low ISO is better on K-7 but obviously 1600+ Iso is >> better on K-X. > > I suspect you'd have to do some particularly specific comparisons to > find a practical difference. > > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
