Lol!! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Saturday, 27 February 2010 3:20 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: best wide angle - for shooting interiors?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eckinator wrote: > 2010/2/26 John Francis <[email protected]>: > > > > The DA* 16-50 is [...] quite > > good fairly close up, too - in fact it's easier to fill the frame > > with a subject using the 16-50 than it is with the 50-135, because > > quite often the minimum focussing distance of the 50-135 can be the limiting factor. > > if you want to shoot kids up close with the 16-50 better have a smear > cleanable filter on - lens to subject at closest distance on mine is > so short a big dog could almost lick the front element... and kids' > arms are longer than big dogs' tongues... ]=) If I want to shoot kids up close I find that a .22 is a better choice ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4899 (20100226) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
