Just because a master can make a great picture with any camera, doesn't mean that they have to limit themselves to cheap equipment. That Ansel Adams used what he did, does not detract from the pictures that he made.
It's always the photographer, and besides that he was as good (if not better) of a printer as he was a photographer. On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling" > Subject: Re: A Crazy Idea > > > >> >> I think the point is that the best equipment won't improve a mediocre >> photographer. >> > > Yeah, trot out the tired old saw about how it's always the photographer. > If that was the case, Ansel Adams would have done his magnificent landscapes > with a Kodak X-15. > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
