Maybe you need a bigger fanny (as the Brits giggle). On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/1/2010 11:06 AM, eckinator wrote: >> >> 2010/4/1 Doug Brewer<[email protected]>: >>> >>> ummm, April Fool's? >> >> The 24/1.4 has me thinking that, too >> 24 mm FF ain't a blues or fetish lens really > > I also do a lot of landscape photography, particularly at night, and wide > and fast are the big weak point of the aps sensor and available glass. An > old nikkor 50/1.4 should be fairly easy to find for a reasonable price. > > The 28-105 I have is only f/2.8 at that end, but should be fast enough to > start with with the D700. > > But, yeah, it was an April Fool's joke. The scary thing for my bank account > is how feasible I could make it seem. Get a D700 for the shots I tend to > use my shorter lenses for. My 28-105 on a D700 probably isn't as sharp as a > 16-50, but it's nearly as fast and covers a wider range. Compare the D700 > sensor with the K20 and the lens is faster than a 16-50 on my K20. > > I wouldn't sell my Pentax gear though, there are too many things that it > does better than a D700 (like fit in my fannypack). > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
