Thanks Bob.
K-7 sizes is what I would expect given the PEFs from the K10D. I think
the K20D (definitely the K10D) doesn't write compressed DNG, while the
K-7 does. The PEFs from the K10D are compressed, so they're smaller
than the DNGs. I have no idea what Samsung are doing, but they're
shooting themselves in the foot. I'm using RAW+JPEG which means each
shot is generating up to 35MB of data and the buffer is clearly too
small to do an efficient job. No big deal for me as I'm a one shot
kinda guy, but the tail-gunners out there won't be happy.
Cheers,
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 21 April 2010 21:37, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> M,
> K20 DNG's are 23+ MB
> K7 DNG's are 13-18 MB. Lowest I have is 11 MB.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Miserere <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Gey Guys,
>>
>> While I'm waiting for my site to back up, I just remembered I wanted
>> to ask you guys something: Can you tell me how large the RAW files are
>> form the K20D and K-7? DNG, PEF or both, if you know.
>>
>> I'm reviewing the nifty Samsung NX10 for my (hacked) site. It's a very
>> nice camera and uses Samsung's 14MP CMOS sensor, producing 4592x3056px
>> SRW (Samsung RAW) files in the 22.5 - 28.5 MB range (most are around
>> 27.5MB), which seems huge to me. My K10D shoots ~10MB PEFs.
>>
>> I thought I'd compare this with files from the K20D and K-7.
>>
>> If anyone is interested in this camera, Part 1 of my review is up:
>>
>> http://enticingthelight.com/2010/04/19/review-samsung-nx10-part-1-first-impressions/
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> --M.
>>
>> --
>>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
