On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting photo. Though these days, why do it in camera rather than in > post? Us Dinasours find it hard to let go.:-) Good shot Jack. Dave > >>> >> >> This reminds me of an idle thought I had on my way to work this morning. I >> can't think of a good non-technical reason why the aperture should remain >> the same size during exposure. It should be possible in this computerised >> day and age to set the camera so that the aperture starts at say f/2.8 and >> stops at say f/11 during the exposure, not necessarily changing at a >> linear >> rate. Of course, the computer would have to calculate the exposure time >> accordingly, but it could have an interesting effect on the areas outside >> the critical plane of focus. > > Very cool ideal. > >> >> Whether the investment required to develop it is worth it is a different >> matter, of course. > > You could try it on a night shot with a manual lens, but that might jiggle > things around too much. > >> >> B >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
