Did you shoot in RAW mode? That seems to make a world of difference noise-wise in some cameras.
Jeffery On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Well, you would have to determine what factors are most important to > you. As far as low light goes, it is the best Pentax body and > possibly the best APS-C body from any maker. As far as size and > ergonomics, it is great. Now, does it compare to the K20D or K7 when > it comes to things like robust body, weather sealing, more specific > options? Probably not. It is a generation ahead of the K20D so I > find the AF to be a little better than the K20, probably not far from > the K7. > > You will need to tell us more of what is important to you. I can say > that it has changed some of my shooting style and thinking because of > the high ISO ability. You can dial up the ISO and get great shots. > Here is an ISO 1600 shot - no post processing other than sizing down > for web: > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto-00063.htm > > Highly recommended camera for the money. If I could only have/use > one body between my K-x and K20D, it would be the K-x. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Friday, April 30, 2010, 4:15:38 PM, you wrote: > > JS> While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who > JS> might want a bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on > JS> the Pentax K-x? Does anyone on the forum have and use one? > > JS> Jeffery Smith > JS> New Orleans, LA > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
