Second shot. (It makes me think my glasses weren't clean for the first one.) It's amazing how much more powerful the impression is with the sharp photo. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I was at a concert this weekend, and came up with (among other things) a pair > of photos I couldn't decide between, so I included them both in the gallery. > > I usually only like photos which I can describe as being "reasonably sharp". > Now, when shooting low-light high-movement subjects such as a rock concert, > that's sometimes an unachievable goal. Nonetheless, this is the first blurry > shot I've taken which I actually like. > > So, I'm sorta curious: which do you prefer? The first blurry shot, or the > moderately-clear shot taken 5 seconds later? > > Blurry (1/15 sec): > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/honeydogs_firstave/content/IMGP1150_large.html > > Clear (1/25 sec): > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/honeydogs_firstave/content/IMGP1152_large.html > > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson - [email protected] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
