This is an example of PDML at its best. No one could think more highly of you both.
Well said both Frank and William. Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of frank theriault Sent: 27 January 2002 13:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MX problems Hi, Bill, Well, since you've "outed" yourself as the vendor of the MX, I just want to state publicly one more time that I have no problem with the transaction, your description of the MX prior to shipment, and your reaction once I contacted you to describe the problem that I had to it. In fact, you've been much more accommodating than any reasonable person would have a right to expect. My query to the list was only to feel out whether other list members might have had similar problems with their MX's, and what remedies, if any, might be sought. I certainly feel badly that some people thought to question your motives as vendor. I'm confident that those individuals, firstly, didn't know that you were the vendor, and secondly, that they didn't know that we had already made suitable arrangements with regard to the problem. On second thought, I probably should have made the latter point clear in my first post. I know that you sell equipment on a regular basis, and I simply want to set the record straight so that any future transactions that you may involve yourself in, aren't adversely affected by this thread. regards, frank William Robb wrote: > For the record, no, I didn't know of the problem when I shipped > the camera out. I have used this technique from time to time > with recalcitrant camera bodies, on the advice of a qualified > service person. > Also, for the record, here is my response to Frank when he > queried me: > > William Robb wrote: > > > Try paddling its backside. > > Really. Hold it around the top and smack the base of it into > > your other hand. Ummm, I will leave it up to you about what > you > > do with it. If you decide you want to keep it, take any repair > > costs off the price we agreed upon. > > > > If you decide not to keep it, ummm, no, I don't want it back. > I > > will never use it or get it repaired. > > > > Consider it yours, and deal with it as you see fit. > > > > Have fun > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:42 AM > Subject: Re: MX problems > > > Hi Frank ... > > > > Clearly the seller knew of the problems. I'd try to return it > and get a > > better one as a good CLA might be more than it's worth, but, > if you're > > planning on getting one IAC, maybe not. Maybe you can ask the > seller to > > contribute a few $$ to the repair. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
