> > I'd say yes it did. Abnormal use = abuse. I seriously doubt > that camera designers factor in an alcoholic drink being > spilled onto their non-waterproof body, and would certify > normal performance thereafter. >
I disagree. Abnormal use does not equal - indeed, does not even imply - abuse. The designers of anything have a responsibility to take human factors into account. These include taking your camera into a pub where somebody might spill a drink on it. The designers are not obliged to guarantee that the camera will work afterwards, but I wouldn't class something like that as abuse, I'd call it normal wear and tear. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
