On 01/06/2010 12:19 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2010-06-01 11:49 , William Robb wrote:
On 01/06/2010 11:24 AM, steve harley wrote:
On 2010-06-01 08:46 , P. J. Alling wrote:
Google is a competitor with Microsoft, they both want the same thing,
TWD, total world domination, Now Linux and Apple may want the same
thing
but for a number of reasons that's unlikely with either. Why give
sustenance to your enemy?
uh, Google and Apple are the more obvious sparring partners at this
point
It is possible to have more than one competitor at a time.
sure, but that doesn't make the argument (that Google doesn't give
employees Windows computers because it is a competitor to Microsoft)
sensible
The link that was sent out pretty much gave Google's reason in the first
sentence. Now this may be the real reason, or it my be an invented
reason, or there may be a variety of reasons all leading up to a decision.
Whether or not this is a sensible decision, I have no opinion on. They
get to run their business the way they want to, and businesses don't
always make sensible decisions.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
