I'm not a statistician, but I spend lots of professional time with statistics, and there are two things to note about these data:
1. The numbers of subjects (cameras) are very small, especially for the K20D; 2. This is nothing approaching a random sample of cameras, and one can only guess what the biases are; 3. Past 49,000 clicks on the K10D, the numbers are so small that the curves are very "unstable"--which is to say that one failure (or survival) has a disproportionate effect. The K20D numbers are so pathetic as to be completely meaningless. In short, crap. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Thu, 6/24/10, eckinator <eckina...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's data for the K10D > http://olegkikin.com/shutterlife/pentax_k10d.htm - now > all we need is > a master Pentaxian to let us know if shutters are the same. > Also I > agree with Paul about a showcase queen; shutters need to be > exercised > so next to nothing may be suspicious, too. > Happy shopping > Ecke > > 2010/6/25 Eric Weir <eew...@bellsouth.net>: > > > > There's a K20D with a DA 28-55 DA lens for sale on > eBay. Is a shutter count of 26000 high? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Eric Weir > > Decatur, GA USA > > eew...@bellsouth.net > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.