On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 23/07/2010, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the problem is that people are posting so many PESOs these days >> that the PUG might be seen as being less necessary than in the past. >> >> That's a pity because the PUG is a permanent gallery and it's good fun >> to wander though past galleries - all the way back to March 1998 - to >> see how people tackled the different themes. And then there's that "I >> remember him/her" or "Who the hell was....." nostalgia :-)> > > The main problem for me is that the PUG is stuck in a bit of a time > warp, the maximum size for image submissions means that certain image > attributes (and often a lot of the interest) tend to get lost in the > downsizing. > I agree. Scot upsized it a bit, but the pics are still on the itty bitty side. Paul
> -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
