Rob and Paul: Yes, the PUG has size limitations, but then so does the Pentax Photo Gallery. Many members of this group still submit there, despite the size of the images.
I really think that the PUG can serve a purpose for the list. There is something really satisfying about seeing a number of interesting interpretations of the monthly theme, and that can result in good interchanges. I know I learned a lot. For years, before we all got digital cameras, the PUG held the group together. I would like to continue the tradition. There is still time to enter images for June, as well as July and August. I hope that more people will take advantage of that, and re-energize our own little gallery. Dan On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:21 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > >> On 23/07/2010, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think the problem is that people are posting so many PESOs these days >>> that the PUG might be seen as being less necessary than in the past. >>> >>> That's a pity because the PUG is a permanent gallery and it's good fun >>> to wander though past galleries - all the way back to March 1998 - to >>> see how people tackled the different themes. And then there's that "I >>> remember him/her" or "Who the hell was....." nostalgia :-)> >> >> The main problem for me is that the PUG is stuck in a bit of a time >> warp, the maximum size for image submissions means that certain image >> attributes (and often a lot of the interest) tend to get lost in the >> downsizing. >> > I agree. Scot upsized it a bit, but the pics are still on the itty bitty side. > Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
