On 7/29/2010 9:45 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29/07/2010, Brian Walters<[email protected]> wrote:
Well, I think the PUG is pretty much a dead duck. It's got such a low
profile now that people just don't remember to post. And the delays
don't help.
I'll keep participating but I'm not hopeful of it surviving much longer.
I agree, back in its heyday it was unique little space, it had pretty
impressive participation (especially considering all images were
scans), the themes were fun and it was for the most part the main way
that we exchanged images. Now with the multitude of other options and
the ease of posting an image whenever one pleases it's become far less
relevant IMO. We had a similar discussion to this a couple of years
back I recall and participation hasn't improved.
If you go back to the really early days, there were times that the PUG
had maybe three or four entries. The bigest problem is that the
schedule has to be kept up. Scott did a pretty good job when he
started, but I don't even remember the last time he posted to the list.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
