so turn auto-snap off. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Gasha <[email protected]> wrote: > I use GIMP mostly. > Of course it works! And it is free! > > 1) if you get picture right, you don't need PhotoShop/GIMP/etc... > 2) you can download it and do some work, even if you are visiting your > friends > 3) some usefull features in PhotoShop, turned out not soo "usefull" after > working with GIMP. for example, if you want to crop 1-2 pixels, it is more > easy to do it in GIMP, not in Photoshop, where it tries to auto-snap mouse > to image boundary :( > > Gasha > > Graydon wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:16:36PM -0500, Walter G. scripsit: >>> >>> That said, I do have an ancient version of Photoshop Elements (2.0) >>> that I got with a hard drive purchase many years ago. Any thoughts as >>> to whether or not it would still be better to use than GIMP? >> >> If you need 16 bit colour management for printing, you might wish to >> take a look at CinePaint. (Common ancestry with the GIMP, forked by >> Hollywood ages ago.) >> >> If you're not printing, the GIMP is entirely fine for online images. >> >> -- Graydon (it's not actually what one would call _bad_ for printing >> with the right plugins, either; it's just not 16 bit.) >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
